You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm submitting an open dataset with a corresponding OEMetadata string for review.
Please see review_process.md for technical detail.
The CLEVER report is the result of 4 years of collaborative work between European experts from
the academia and civil society of 20+ European countries, under the leadership of the négaWatt Association. The CLEVER scenario, which covers 30 countries (EU27 plus United-Kingdom, Norway and Switzerland2), is based on a unique
approach that combines sufficiency, efficiency and renewables and aims to reconcile long
term climate and sustainability imperatives with short-term energy security constraints. Although the scenario and its global results stand true for this set of 30 countries, many of the results presented in this report relate to the EU27 level,
which is specifically mentioned. While EU energy and climate scenarios are often built top-down with little national granularity,
CLEVER is a fully bottom-up aggregation of national trajectories. It proposes a transformation pathway for Europe, the EU and its Member States, which is feasible – and deeply enshrined into national contexts, with equity and European integration as core values
Workflow checklist
GitHub
I have submitted this issue to have metadata and data review documented (Issue #NR)
Create a new review-branch and push OEMetadata to new branch (review/project_nameofdata#NR). If this step is too difficult, attach a file with the metadata as a comment in this issue and let the reviewer know.
OEP
Upload data to the OEP in schema model_draft (see upload tutorial)
Start a Review
Start a pull request (PR) from review-branch to master
Assign a reviewer and get in contact
Reviewer section
A reviewer starts working on the issue
Review data license
A reviewer finished working on this issue (and awarded a badge)
Update metadata on table
Data moved to its final schema
[x ] Add OEP tags to table
Merge PR and delete review-branch
Document final links of metadata and data in issue description
I reviewed the metadata in the beginning of the week. As far as I know it is know being checked by @yechenyan and @jh-RLI. The work process can be ssen in PR #115. If you have comments or questions feel free to also contact me, as @christian-rli suggested in the e-mail he wrote.
Issue description
I'm submitting an open dataset with a corresponding OEMetadata string for review.
Please see review_process.md for technical detail.
The CLEVER report is the result of 4 years of collaborative work between European experts from
the academia and civil society of 20+ European countries, under the leadership of the négaWatt Association. The CLEVER scenario, which covers 30 countries (EU27 plus United-Kingdom, Norway and Switzerland2), is based on a unique
approach that combines sufficiency, efficiency and renewables and aims to reconcile long
term climate and sustainability imperatives with short-term energy security constraints. Although the scenario and its global results stand true for this set of 30 countries, many of the results presented in this report relate to the EU27 level,
which is specifically mentioned. While EU energy and climate scenarios are often built top-down with little national granularity,
CLEVER is a fully bottom-up aggregation of national trajectories. It proposes a transformation pathway for Europe, the EU and its Member States, which is feasible – and deeply enshrined into national contexts, with equity and European integration as core values
Workflow checklist
Metadata and data for review
Here are the links to my data and metadata. Naming follows the pattern:
nègaWatt - CLEVER Scenario - table title EU30 + EU27 countries, aggregated and individually (table_title_short)
Metadata: https://openenergyplatform.org/dataedit/view/model_draft?query=&tags=549
Data: https://openenergyplatform.org/dataedit/view/model_draft?query=&tags=549
Reviewed and published metadata and data
Final naming and location of the data and metadata after the review are as follows:
schema.tablename
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: