You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
DDL has previously just took the first instance of the actor's name appearance in our database as generally the "preferred" version. Do we have a stricter logic for the OpenClimate Schema?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think the preferred name would be the one we would show as default for a language, and the "name" column in Actor is the fallback in case there are no matches.
Preference might include these factors, in no particular order:
Readability (Cocos Islands more readable than Territory of Cocos (Keeling) Islands, The)
Briefness (Bolivia is briefer than Plurinational State of Bolivia)
Frequency of use
Official use (example: Mumbai vs Bombay, Alphabet Inc. vs Google, Deere & Company vs. John Deere)
Current use
Word order
Clarity (example: United Kingdom is clearer than UK, North Korea is clearer than DPRK)
I think for 99% of actors, we'll have only one or two names in any particular language. In general, I'd probably defer to Wikipedia or Wikidata for names, since they have a lot of editors and contributors who put in a lot of time discussing the best name to use!
Maybe we should change this to a Q score. Like 0 -> 1, where 1.0 is the best name to use, and 0 is the worst name to use. If an Actor has lots of names, use the one with the best score.
DDL has previously just took the first instance of the actor's name appearance in our database as generally the "preferred" version. Do we have a stricter logic for the OpenClimate Schema?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: