Evaluate approach for GORO ontology and start development

[pedropaulofb]

The GORO ontology was published as a part of SEON. Later, the paper entitled GORO 2.0: Evolving an ontology for goal-oriented requirements engineering develop a second version of this ontology. However, the authors of the first version of the ontology are not the same authors of the second version.

1. We must decide if these ontologies are going to generate a single dataset or if they are going to generate two distinct datasets.
2. After the decision we have to start the dataset with the information provided by the authors of the second version of the ontology.

@tgoprince, @Matt-81, and @claudenirmf, can you please register your opinions about the first item? Thank you in advance.

[pedropaulofb]

I had a meeting with Fabiano Ruy, which published the SEON. He is going to evaluate the new version to check if GORO 2.0 can really be called an evolution of GORO or if it should be considered a new ontology.