Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Please fix broken off screen gestures Not Working in One Plus 3 [ Nougat ] #31

Closed
maddalakum opened this issue Feb 7, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

Please fix broken off screen gestures Not Working in One Plus 3 [ Nougat ] #31

maddalakum opened this issue Feb 7, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@maddalakum
Copy link

Screen off gestures Not Working Please Help me to Fix . Thanks in Advance
@aaronqiuchiu
Copy link

@maddalakum please reference the following answer and try it .
#21

Thanks

Martinusbe referenced this issue in GZR-Kernels/kernel_oneplus_msm8996 Jul 24, 2017
@Martinusbe
workqueue: fix rebind bound workers warning
aae7693 
[ Upstream commit f7c17d26f43d5cc1b7a6b896cd2fa24a079739b9 ]

------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 16 at kernel/workqueue.c:4559 rebind_workers+0x1c0/0x1d0
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 16 Comm: cpuhp/0 Not tainted 4.6.0-rc4+ #31
Hardware name: IBM IBM System x3550 M4 Server -[7914IUW]-/00Y8603, BIOS -[D7E128FUS-1.40]- 07/23/2013
 0000000000000000 ffff881037babb58 ffffffff8139d885 0000000000000010
 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffff881037babba8
 ffffffff8108505d ffff881037ba0000 000011cf3e7d6e60 0000000000000046
Call Trace:
 dump_stack+0x89/0xd4
 __warn+0xfd/0x120
 warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20
 rebind_workers+0x1c0/0x1d0
 workqueue_cpu_up_callback+0xf5/0x1d0
 notifier_call_chain+0x64/0x90
 ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xf2/0x220
 ? notify_prepare+0x80/0x80
 __raw_notifier_call_chain+0xe/0x10
 __cpu_notify+0x35/0x50
 notify_down_prepare+0x5e/0x80
 ? notify_prepare+0x80/0x80
 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x73/0x330
 ? __schedule+0x33e/0x8a0
 cpuhp_down_callbacks+0x51/0xc0
 cpuhp_thread_fun+0xc1/0xf0
 smpboot_thread_fn+0x159/0x2a0
 ? smpboot_create_threads+0x80/0x80
 kthread+0xef/0x110
 ? wait_for_completion+0xf0/0x120
 ? schedule_tail+0x35/0xf0
 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x50
 ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70
---[ end trace eb12ae47d2382d8f ]---
notify_down_prepare: attempt to take down CPU 0 failed

This bug can be reproduced by below config w/ nohz_full= all cpus:

CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_HOTPLUG_CPU0=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_HOTPLUG_CPU0=y
CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=y

As Thomas pointed out:

| If a down prepare callback fails, then DOWN_FAILED is invoked for all
| callbacks which have successfully executed DOWN_PREPARE.
|
| But, workqueue has actually two notifiers. One which handles
| UP/DOWN_FAILED/ONLINE and one which handles DOWN_PREPARE.
|
| Now look at the priorities of those callbacks:
|
| CPU_PRI_WORKQUEUE_UP        = 5
| CPU_PRI_WORKQUEUE_DOWN      = -5
|
| So the call order on DOWN_PREPARE is:
|
| CB 1
| CB ...
| CB workqueue_up() -> Ignores DOWN_PREPARE
| CB ...
| CB X ---> Fails
|
| So we call up to CB X with DOWN_FAILED
|
| CB 1
| CB ...
| CB workqueue_up() -> Handles DOWN_FAILED
| CB ...
| CB X-1
|
| So the problem is that the workqueue stuff handles DOWN_FAILED in the up
| callback, while it should do it in the down callback. Which is not a good idea
| either because it wants to be called early on rollback...
|
| Brilliant stuff, isn't it? The hotplug rework will solve this problem because
| the callbacks become symetric, but for the existing mess, we need some
| workaround in the workqueue code.

The boot CPU handles housekeeping duty(unbound timers, workqueues,
timekeeping, ...) on behalf of full dynticks CPUs. It must remain
online when nohz full is enabled. There is a priority set to every
notifier_blocks:

workqueue_cpu_up > tick_nohz_cpu_down > workqueue_cpu_down

So tick_nohz_cpu_down callback failed when down prepare cpu 0, and
notifier_blocks behind tick_nohz_cpu_down will not be called any
more, which leads to workers are actually not unbound. Then hotplug
state machine will fallback to undo and online cpu 0 again. Workers
will be rebound unconditionally even if they are not unbound and
trigger the warning in this progress.

This patch fix it by catching !DISASSOCIATED to avoid rebind bound
workers.

Cc: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Frédéric Weisbecker <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Suggested-by: Lai Jiangshan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Martinusbe <[email protected]>
Martinusbe referenced this issue in GZR-Kernels/kernel_oneplus_msm8996 Jul 24, 2017
@Martinusbe
drm/gma500: Fix possible out of bounds read
5758ae3 
[ Upstream commit 7ccca1d5bf69fdd1d3c5fcf84faf1659a6e0ad11 ]

Fix possible out of bounds read, by adding missing comma.
The code may read pass the end of the dsi_errors array
when the most significant bit (bit #31) in the intr_stat register
is set.
This bug has been detected using CppCheck (static analysis tool).

Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Itai Handler <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Patrik Jakobsson <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Martinusbe <[email protected]>
mj1687 pushed a commit to Tunder-Kernel/android_kernel_oneplus_msm8996 that referenced this issue Jul 25, 2017
@mj1687
workqueue: fix rebind bound workers warning
b219c52 
[ Upstream commit f7c17d26f43d5cc1b7a6b896cd2fa24a079739b9 ]

------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 16 at kernel/workqueue.c:4559 rebind_workers+0x1c0/0x1d0
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 16 Comm: cpuhp/0 Not tainted 4.6.0-rc4+ OnePlusOSS#31
Hardware name: IBM IBM System x3550 M4 Server -[7914IUW]-/00Y8603, BIOS -[D7E128FUS-1.40]- 07/23/2013
 0000000000000000 ffff881037babb58 ffffffff8139d885 0000000000000010
 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffff881037babba8
 ffffffff8108505d ffff881037ba0000 000011cf3e7d6e60 0000000000000046
Call Trace:
 dump_stack+0x89/0xd4
 __warn+0xfd/0x120
 warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20
 rebind_workers+0x1c0/0x1d0
 workqueue_cpu_up_callback+0xf5/0x1d0
 notifier_call_chain+0x64/0x90
 ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xf2/0x220
 ? notify_prepare+0x80/0x80
 __raw_notifier_call_chain+0xe/0x10
 __cpu_notify+0x35/0x50
 notify_down_prepare+0x5e/0x80
 ? notify_prepare+0x80/0x80
 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x73/0x330
 ? __schedule+0x33e/0x8a0
 cpuhp_down_callbacks+0x51/0xc0
 cpuhp_thread_fun+0xc1/0xf0
 smpboot_thread_fn+0x159/0x2a0
 ? smpboot_create_threads+0x80/0x80
 kthread+0xef/0x110
 ? wait_for_completion+0xf0/0x120
 ? schedule_tail+0x35/0xf0
 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x50
 ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70
---[ end trace eb12ae47d2382d8f ]---
notify_down_prepare: attempt to take down CPU 0 failed

This bug can be reproduced by below config w/ nohz_full= all cpus:

CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_HOTPLUG_CPU0=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_HOTPLUG_CPU0=y
CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=y

As Thomas pointed out:

| If a down prepare callback fails, then DOWN_FAILED is invoked for all
| callbacks which have successfully executed DOWN_PREPARE.
|
| But, workqueue has actually two notifiers. One which handles
| UP/DOWN_FAILED/ONLINE and one which handles DOWN_PREPARE.
|
| Now look at the priorities of those callbacks:
|
| CPU_PRI_WORKQUEUE_UP        = 5
| CPU_PRI_WORKQUEUE_DOWN      = -5
|
| So the call order on DOWN_PREPARE is:
|
| CB 1
| CB ...
| CB workqueue_up() -> Ignores DOWN_PREPARE
| CB ...
| CB X ---> Fails
|
| So we call up to CB X with DOWN_FAILED
|
| CB 1
| CB ...
| CB workqueue_up() -> Handles DOWN_FAILED
| CB ...
| CB X-1
|
| So the problem is that the workqueue stuff handles DOWN_FAILED in the up
| callback, while it should do it in the down callback. Which is not a good idea
| either because it wants to be called early on rollback...
|
| Brilliant stuff, isn't it? The hotplug rework will solve this problem because
| the callbacks become symetric, but for the existing mess, we need some
| workaround in the workqueue code.

The boot CPU handles housekeeping duty(unbound timers, workqueues,
timekeeping, ...) on behalf of full dynticks CPUs. It must remain
online when nohz full is enabled. There is a priority set to every
notifier_blocks:

workqueue_cpu_up > tick_nohz_cpu_down > workqueue_cpu_down

So tick_nohz_cpu_down callback failed when down prepare cpu 0, and
notifier_blocks behind tick_nohz_cpu_down will not be called any
more, which leads to workers are actually not unbound. Then hotplug
state machine will fallback to undo and online cpu 0 again. Workers
will be rebound unconditionally even if they are not unbound and
trigger the warning in this progress.

This patch fix it by catching !DISASSOCIATED to avoid rebind bound
workers.

Cc: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Frédéric Weisbecker <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Suggested-by: Lai Jiangshan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
mj1687 pushed a commit to Tunder-Kernel/android_kernel_oneplus_msm8996 that referenced this issue Jul 25, 2017
@mj1687
drm/gma500: Fix possible out of bounds read
601777c 
[ Upstream commit 7ccca1d5bf69fdd1d3c5fcf84faf1659a6e0ad11 ]

Fix possible out of bounds read, by adding missing comma.
The code may read pass the end of the dsi_errors array
when the most significant bit (bit OnePlusOSS#31) in the intr_stat register
is set.
This bug has been detected using CppCheck (static analysis tool).

Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Itai Handler <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Patrik Jakobsson <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
mj1687 pushed a commit to Tunder-Kernel/android_kernel_oneplus_msm8996 that referenced this issue Aug 11, 2017
@mj1687
workqueue: fix rebind bound workers warning
1fea3bb 
[ Upstream commit f7c17d26f43d5cc1b7a6b896cd2fa24a079739b9 ]

------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 16 at kernel/workqueue.c:4559 rebind_workers+0x1c0/0x1d0
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 16 Comm: cpuhp/0 Not tainted 4.6.0-rc4+ OnePlusOSS#31
Hardware name: IBM IBM System x3550 M4 Server -[7914IUW]-/00Y8603, BIOS -[D7E128FUS-1.40]- 07/23/2013
 0000000000000000 ffff881037babb58 ffffffff8139d885 0000000000000010
 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffff881037babba8
 ffffffff8108505d ffff881037ba0000 000011cf3e7d6e60 0000000000000046
Call Trace:
 dump_stack+0x89/0xd4
 __warn+0xfd/0x120
 warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20
 rebind_workers+0x1c0/0x1d0
 workqueue_cpu_up_callback+0xf5/0x1d0
 notifier_call_chain+0x64/0x90
 ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xf2/0x220
 ? notify_prepare+0x80/0x80
 __raw_notifier_call_chain+0xe/0x10
 __cpu_notify+0x35/0x50
 notify_down_prepare+0x5e/0x80
 ? notify_prepare+0x80/0x80
 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x73/0x330
 ? __schedule+0x33e/0x8a0
 cpuhp_down_callbacks+0x51/0xc0
 cpuhp_thread_fun+0xc1/0xf0
 smpboot_thread_fn+0x159/0x2a0
 ? smpboot_create_threads+0x80/0x80
 kthread+0xef/0x110
 ? wait_for_completion+0xf0/0x120
 ? schedule_tail+0x35/0xf0
 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x50
 ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70
---[ end trace eb12ae47d2382d8f ]---
notify_down_prepare: attempt to take down CPU 0 failed

This bug can be reproduced by below config w/ nohz_full= all cpus:

CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_HOTPLUG_CPU0=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_HOTPLUG_CPU0=y
CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=y

As Thomas pointed out:

| If a down prepare callback fails, then DOWN_FAILED is invoked for all
| callbacks which have successfully executed DOWN_PREPARE.
|
| But, workqueue has actually two notifiers. One which handles
| UP/DOWN_FAILED/ONLINE and one which handles DOWN_PREPARE.
|
| Now look at the priorities of those callbacks:
|
| CPU_PRI_WORKQUEUE_UP        = 5
| CPU_PRI_WORKQUEUE_DOWN      = -5
|
| So the call order on DOWN_PREPARE is:
|
| CB 1
| CB ...
| CB workqueue_up() -> Ignores DOWN_PREPARE
| CB ...
| CB X ---> Fails
|
| So we call up to CB X with DOWN_FAILED
|
| CB 1
| CB ...
| CB workqueue_up() -> Handles DOWN_FAILED
| CB ...
| CB X-1
|
| So the problem is that the workqueue stuff handles DOWN_FAILED in the up
| callback, while it should do it in the down callback. Which is not a good idea
| either because it wants to be called early on rollback...
|
| Brilliant stuff, isn't it? The hotplug rework will solve this problem because
| the callbacks become symetric, but for the existing mess, we need some
| workaround in the workqueue code.

The boot CPU handles housekeeping duty(unbound timers, workqueues,
timekeeping, ...) on behalf of full dynticks CPUs. It must remain
online when nohz full is enabled. There is a priority set to every
notifier_blocks:

workqueue_cpu_up > tick_nohz_cpu_down > workqueue_cpu_down

So tick_nohz_cpu_down callback failed when down prepare cpu 0, and
notifier_blocks behind tick_nohz_cpu_down will not be called any
more, which leads to workers are actually not unbound. Then hotplug
state machine will fallback to undo and online cpu 0 again. Workers
will be rebound unconditionally even if they are not unbound and
trigger the warning in this progress.

This patch fix it by catching !DISASSOCIATED to avoid rebind bound
workers.

Cc: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Frédéric Weisbecker <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Suggested-by: Lai Jiangshan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
mj1687 pushed a commit to Tunder-Kernel/android_kernel_oneplus_msm8996 that referenced this issue Aug 11, 2017
@mj1687
drm/gma500: Fix possible out of bounds read
4686f95 
[ Upstream commit 7ccca1d5bf69fdd1d3c5fcf84faf1659a6e0ad11 ]

Fix possible out of bounds read, by adding missing comma.
The code may read pass the end of the dsi_errors array
when the most significant bit (bit OnePlusOSS#31) in the intr_stat register
is set.
This bug has been detected using CppCheck (static analysis tool).

Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Itai Handler <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Patrik Jakobsson <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
@simonpunk simonpunk mentioned this issue Nov 16, 2017
Closed
ppajda pushed a commit to ppajda/android_kernel_oneplus_msm8996 that referenced this issue Jun 1, 2020
@zlim @ppajda
arm64: bpf: jit JMP_JSET_{X,K}
5ee604f 
commit 98397fc547e3f4553553a30ea56fa34d613f0a4c upstream.

Original implementation commit e54bcde ("arm64: eBPF JIT compiler")
had the relevant code paths, but due to an oversight always fail jiting.

As a result, we had been falling back to BPF interpreter whenever a BPF
program has JMP_JSET_{X,K} instructions.

With this fix, we confirm that the corresponding tests in lib/test_bpf
continue to pass, and also jited.

...
[    2.784553] test_bpf: OnePlusOSS#30 JSET jited:1 188 192 197 PASS
[    2.791373] test_bpf: OnePlusOSS#31 tcpdump port 22 jited:1 325 677 625 PASS
[    2.808800] test_bpf: OnePlusOSS#32 tcpdump complex jited:1 323 731 991 PASS
...
[    3.190759] test_bpf: #237 JMP_JSET_K: if (0x3 & 0x2) return 1 jited:1 110 PASS
[    3.192524] test_bpf: #238 JMP_JSET_K: if (0x3 & 0xffffffff) return 1 jited:1 98 PASS
[    3.211014] test_bpf: #249 JMP_JSET_X: if (0x3 & 0x2) return 1 jited:1 120 PASS
[    3.212973] test_bpf: #250 JMP_JSET_X: if (0x3 & 0xffffffff) return 1 jited:1 89 PASS
...

Fixes: e54bcde ("arm64: eBPF JIT compiler")
Signed-off-by: Zi Shen Lim <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yang Shi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <[email protected]>
Change-Id: I0b05c7cfae168d48bb28a61764b8598d6028de8f
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@aaronqiuchiu @maddalakum