-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Marine] Additional Occupancy codes for Marine Cargo to Accompany Current Marine Construction codes #210
Comments
@johcarter as discussed - one for your review. One to discuss? |
As a follow-up point to highlight, the current construction code 6103 (Marine Cargo, Combustible: Heavy Cargo) refers to "heavy machinery that cannot be fit into a standard container". The propped occ codes above 1406 refers to "Heavy Industrial equipment stored in a container in or around a port". |
Following further discussions, the proposal has now changed to add one occupancy code (see below) to be used in conjunction with the following new construction codes.
Proposed "Marine Cargo" construction codes to fit in with the existing code ranges.
The following descriptions will be amended to current construction codes. Addition shown in bold:
Previously proposed occ codes above (1410-1414) mainly covering the storage and stockpiling of cargo in warehouses or open spaces will now be left out of this release (mainly due to lack of a confirmed requirement for them) and can be reviewed and added in as a minor release the future if necessary. @johcarter you ok to review this? |
Just one slight suggested modification to include livestock in the first general block of codes rather than with the non-combustibles:
The rest looks good to me |
@aiste-kalinauskaite tagging you here for further review. |
After further discussion, @MattDonovan82 and I decided that it made more sense to mirror CEDE occupancy and construction codes for marine cargo, since the new code range in Cede for Occupancy '1001-1012' is designed to work with the newer construction code range '2701 - 2720'. This provides good coverage and simplifies mapping between the OED and CEDE schemes. https://unicede.air-worldwide.com/ts-tsre_all/help_ts_exposure-data_marine-cargo-occ.html The original OED Marine Cargo codes '6000-6199' and CEDE Marine Cargo construction codes in the range '270-296' remain and are in line with each other. I've added a general / unknown occupancy for marine cargo OED Occ Code 1400 which wasn't present in CEDE. Review here: |
these updates look ok to me. I agree aligning with CEDE codes make sense, however should we include the recommended pairings between the occupancy and construction codes somewhere in the description or in the csv? maybe an extra column for "notes" or is that too disruptive? @johcarter |
Description
This is a follow-on from the original issue (#204) where new occupancy codes for marine were initially proposed. Upon further review and discussion, those new occ codes being proposed did not consider or compliment the current construction codes for marine cargo so may have caused confusion.
Rather than removing or altering the current construction codes which would be very disruptive, the new occupancy codes being proposed in this issue should now compliment and be used in conjunction with the existing marine cargo construction codes.
A few of these occupancies such as 'automobiles', 'livestock' and 'electronics' should not be considered duplicates from existing codes with similar names/descriptions as these are specific to marine cargo (and will have a "marine cargo" prefix in the name). These cover items in a port or container whereas the current 'automobiles' construction refers to cars in a car park or lot for example.
Reasons for change
New occupancies for marine to compliment existing marine construction codes in OED.
Scope of change
Impact of change
Non-breaking changes, additional occupancy codes
Data type, default values, are blanks allowed, list valid values
Proposed additional occupancy codes
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: