Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Guidelines for reviewing #161

Open
ksenia-tabakova opened this issue Nov 13, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Guidelines for reviewing #161

ksenia-tabakova opened this issue Nov 13, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@ksenia-tabakova
Copy link
Contributor

Hi!

Feeling dumb to ask, but anyways... What is happening now with the grading of report?

  1. Do I review all reports in my group?
  2. Do I need to run their notebook to test if everything works?
  3. Do I need to give a grade to the report or just write my review as outlined here: https://github.com/NordicESMhub/NEGI-Abisko-2019/blob/master/content/topics/report/Peer-review-matching_timeline_and_guidelines_final_20191021.pdf

Ksenia

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant