Where should diagnostics be placed for NorESM2.5 development simulations?

[mvertens]

Should there be a standard diagnostic place for diagnostic plots? If so - where?

[adagj]

Didn't we already make a common directory? If not I suggest to use NS9560K datalake. @TomasTorsvik @yanchun (I'm not sure why I can tag Yanchun...) what do you think?

[gold2718]

@yanchun (I'm not sure why I can tag Yanchun...)

I think you mean GitHub ID YanchunHe (I think yanchun is some other user) and I think he does not auto-complete because he is not listed in the noresm_core group which is the group that has access to this repo.

[TomasTorsvik]

@adagj , @mvertens - We have 4.2 TB storage left on NS9560K datalake, and are over the limit on the NS9560K datapeak partition. There is now a /nird/datalake/NS9560K/www directory, and I just created a diagnostics subdirectory under this, with group permission set to inherit the ipcc group (same as for /nird/datapeak/NS2345K/www/diagnostics). Output should be available from web pages under
https://ns9560k.web.sigma2.no/datalake/diagnostics/

I have set the group permission to ipcc since this was used before. Alternatively we could use ns9560k or noresm. I don't know who is associated with the different groups on Nird.

[adagj]

Thanks!

[oyvindseland]

It looks to me that it is around 100 Tb free on datapeak?

Project Resource Type Usage Soft Limit Hard Limit
NS9560K datapeak Disk 780.890 TiB 909 TiB 909 TiB
NS9560K datapeak Files 11605469 16809984 19529728

[TomasTorsvik]

Yes, you are right. I looked at the wrong dusage log.

[TomasTorsvik]

@adagj , @mvertens , @oyvindseland - Since we already have some diagnostics output on /nird/datapeak/NS9560K/www/diagnostics, maybe it makes sense to continue using this?

[adagj]

Yes, I agree. Let's use the already existing one. Thanks for checking!

[adagj]

Answer to this discussion: please use the folder /nird/datapeak/NS9560K/www/diagnostics for diagnostics.

Output can be view from https://ns9560k.web.sigma2.no/datapeak/diagnostics/.