Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make available funding information for floss.fund #171

Open
fricklerhandwerk opened this issue Oct 18, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

Make available funding information for floss.fund #171

fricklerhandwerk opened this issue Oct 18, 2024 · 5 comments

Comments

@fricklerhandwerk
Copy link
Contributor

fricklerhandwerk commented Oct 18, 2024

There's this thing: https://floss.fund/blog/announcing-floss-fund/

They offer 10-100k in financial support, but have very special requirements for "applying".

In order to get on their radar, we need a .well-known file with contact information, and an email address on which we're responsive.

I'd be available for responsiveness, but setting up new email forwarders is currently stuck on the @NixOS/infra team.

@Mic92
Copy link
Member

Mic92 commented Oct 18, 2024

@fricklerhandwerk we can have new email forwarders just now with the old setup. Nothing is blocked. We will later transfer it to our own email server.

@fricklerhandwerk fricklerhandwerk changed the title Make available funding information floss.fund Make available funding information for floss.fund Oct 18, 2024
@Mic92
Copy link
Member

Mic92 commented Oct 19, 2024

Ok. Looks like we cannot add new destination email addresses in improvmx without asking the support. This is probably just a way to avoid spammers. Nevertheless, I hope we can switch to the email server soon from @jfly soon.

@zimbatm
Copy link
Member

zimbatm commented Oct 22, 2024

We're not stuck; in the worst case, we can pay $90.-/year to upgrade the account. I removed one of the old aliases so there is room now. Just tell us what alias you want to get @fricklerhandwerk.

@fricklerhandwerk
Copy link
Contributor Author

fricklerhandwerk commented Oct 25, 2024

We could have [email protected] I guess. Wrote you a private message. Anyone else who wants to stay in the loop on that?

@asymmetric
Copy link

I'd like to be in the loop, and in any case, we should definitely include the SC once it's formed. [I'm available to ensure they are informed, if you want]

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants