You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I noticed that in your README that you still link https://docs.dropzone.dev/ as the "Full Documentation".
I believe that there should be a fork of the documentation gitbook, a freebie github.io page would be fine, doesn't need a competing domain name.
I suggest this for two main reasons, though there could be more justification to be found:
What if the original Dropzone documentation disappears one day?
What if a bugfix or feature in this fork changes something enough that the documentation is incorrect (parameter name changed, required config option removed or added, etc.)
I would still perhaps link the original docs as well for sure, not sure how to handle that or if it would be too confusing. Some suggestions:
"Full documentation" is the new/cloned docs, "Original Documentation" is the existing https://docs.dropzone.dev link.
Just "Full documentation" pointing to the new/cloned docs, no old link.
"Full Documentation" new, but "Legacy Documentation" for the old.
Keep https://docs.dropzone.dev as the "Full Documentation" link and just add your cloned one as "Documentation Mirror"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
You don't need to argue your point. I fully agree. It was not done yet because it was not the priority, but thank you for opening this issue. I'll need to look into adding the doc in this repo.
I'll obliterate any mention of the old documentation.
I noticed that in your README that you still link https://docs.dropzone.dev/ as the "Full Documentation".
I believe that there should be a fork of the documentation gitbook, a freebie github.io page would be fine, doesn't need a competing domain name.
I suggest this for two main reasons, though there could be more justification to be found:
I would still perhaps link the original docs as well for sure, not sure how to handle that or if it would be too confusing. Some suggestions:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: