Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FR: Ignore user events in timeline unread status #408

Open
mahdi1234 opened this issue Jan 23, 2021 · 5 comments
Open

FR: Ignore user events in timeline unread status #408

mahdi1234 opened this issue Jan 23, 2021 · 5 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@mahdi1234
Copy link

I'd like timeline show unread status only for new messages, not for user events like leave/join etc e.g. Schildichat has this implemented and to some extent Element clients as well and usability of timeline is way better than clicking the room and realizing no new message posted.

@mahdi1234 mahdi1234 added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 23, 2021
@mahdi1234 mahdi1234 changed the title FR: Ignore user events FR: Ignore user events in timeline unread status Jan 23, 2021
@LorenDB
Copy link
Member

LorenDB commented Jan 23, 2021

What about notifications? (e.g. the messages from the GitHub and Travis CI bots)

@mahdi1234
Copy link
Author

mahdi1234 commented Jan 23, 2021

I think user events can be distinguished from bots/integrations in that case probably two different things? But maybe nheko already filters user events, it got some time until timeline got correct (not used nheko for some months) which confused me.

Edit: Now I get it, timeline is marked us unread, but list of rooms is sorted correctly by last message with also displaying preview of the message, so would be great not to mark the room as unread.

@meain
Copy link

meain commented May 23, 2021

Screenshot 2021-05-23 at 10 45 30 AM

Related: It would be useful if we are able to hide the join/quit events in the timeline or collapse it like what element does. It gets quite noisy for icr bridges.

@deepbluev7
Copy link
Member

@meain You are thinking of #411 :3

@meain
Copy link

meain commented May 23, 2021

Woops, missed that one when I searched. Thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants