Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CI: LiteLLM often fails to start in CI (macos) #212

Open
enricorotundo opened this issue Feb 17, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

CI: LiteLLM often fails to start in CI (macos) #212

enricorotundo opened this issue Feb 17, 2025 · 0 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@enricorotundo
Copy link
Collaborator

It looks like it's quite common for LiteLLM to fail booting in CI (on darwin platform).
Here's an example failed run. There're many more faild runs in CI.
Usually it's sufficient to hit the "re-run job" to move past this issue. However, it may be a symptom of something wrong with the installation process.

[Summary] ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
[Summary]            🔍 SERVICE STATUS              
[Summary] ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
[Summary]                                          
[Summary]   PostgreSQL           ✅
[Summary]   Hub DB               ✅
[Summary]   Celery               ✅
[Summary]   HTTP Server          ✅
[Summary]   WS Server 7002       ✅
[Summary]   LiteLLM              ❌
[Summary]                                          
[Summary] ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
[Summary] 
[Summary] 📋 Error Logs for Failed Services:
[Summary] 
[Summary] 🔴 LiteLLM Logs:
[Summary] 
Error: Process completed with exit code 1.
@enricorotundo enricorotundo changed the title CI: LiteLLM fails to start on macos CI CI: LiteLLM often fails to start in CI (macos) Feb 17, 2025
@enricorotundo enricorotundo added the bug Something isn't working label Feb 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant