Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Training different 'n_mel_channels' models #264

Open
anitaweng opened this issue May 26, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Training different 'n_mel_channels' models #264

anitaweng opened this issue May 26, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@anitaweng
Copy link

Hi,
I tried to train my own model with different 'n_mel_channels', i.e. 160 instead of 80.
Since my autoencoder's output dimension is 160.
The other settings are the same as the original setting.
However, I got the voice with little noise.
My config.json:

{
    "train_config": {
        "fp16_run": true,
        "output_directory": "checkpoints_160",
        "epochs": 100000,
        "learning_rate": 1e-4,
        "sigma": 1.0,
        "iters_per_checkpoint": 10000,
        "batch_size": 12,
        "seed": 1234,
        "checkpoint_path": "",
        "with_tensorboard": true
    },
    "data_config": {
        "training_files": "train_files.txt",
        "segment_length": 16000,
        "sampling_rate": 22050,
        "filter_length": 1024,
        "hop_length": 256,
        "win_length": 1024,
        "mel_fmin": 0.0,
        "mel_fmax": 8000.0, 
        "n_mel_channels": 160
    },
    "dist_config": {
        "dist_backend": "nccl",
        "dist_url": "tcp://localhost:54321"
    },

    "waveglow_config": {
        "n_mel_channels": 160,
        "n_flows": 12,
        "n_group": 8,
        "n_early_every": 4,
        "n_early_size": 2,
        "WN_config": {
            "n_layers": 8,
            "n_channels": 256,
            "kernel_size": 3
        }
    }
}

The outputs of n_mel_channels=80
The outputs of n_mel_channels=160
Is there any idea about how to improve the quality?

@msalhab96
Copy link

Do you use the denosier?

If no try to use the denoiser during inference

@anitaweng
Copy link
Author

Thanks, I will try it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants