You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, instead of determining the climate zone of the user-provided lat/long, we determine the closest representative city and use its climate zone. This can lead to an incorrect zone being used. To fix this, we would want to do something similar to how we determine the AVERT region and would need new shape files that represent the zones not just the cities.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Woops sorry for the slow reply here! I do not believe this was addressed in the Cambium updates. I believe @hdunham is referring to the climate zone used for the CRB and corresponding load profiles (correct?)
Currently, instead of determining the climate zone of the user-provided lat/long, we determine the closest representative city and use its climate zone. This can lead to an incorrect zone being used. To fix this, we would want to do something similar to how we determine the AVERT region and would need new shape files that represent the zones not just the cities.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: