You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Sampling error correction does not appear to impact the adaptive inflation updates.
The value of the sampling error correction is read from the table in subroutine update_from_obs_inc in assim_tools_mod.f90. It is then used to modify the value of the reg_coef which is subsequently multiplied by the obs_inc to get the state_inc which is returned. The updated value of the reg_coef is also returned to the calling location in subroutine obs_updates_ens. However, the reg_coef is a local variable array in obs_update_ens and is not returned from this subroutine. Subroutine update_varying_state_space_inflation does not make any use of the sampling error correction table. It seems like it would be appropriate to apply sampling error correction to reduce the strength of the relation between the observation and state variable when updating the inflation, too.
The current behavior has been unchanged since the original implementation of the adaptive inflation algorithms. Should we update the behavior to include the use of sampling error correction, or should we document that it is not being done?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I can confirm that the regression coefficient used to update the inflation does not apply SEC. I've always thought that SEC is used to update the inflation but I was mistaken. Question: Do we actually need SEC in the inflation update?
To answer this question, we'll need some testing. I'll conduct some experiments with low-order models to gain some insights. More to follow ..
It is my opinion that the most correct thing would be for SEC to apply to
limit the inflation update, just like other adjustments to the regression
coefficient. However, the impact of losing backward compatibility for all
applications is a concern. We would need to do a very broad set of tests
before deciding to implement this.
On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 2:46 PM Moha Gharamti ***@***.***> wrote:
I can confirm that the regression coefficient used to update the inflation
does not apply SEC. I've always thought that SEC is used to update the
inflation but I was mistaken. Question: Do we actually need SEC in the
inflation update?
To answer this question, we'll need some testing. I'll conduct some
experiments with low-order models to gain some insights. More to follow ..
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#778 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANDHUIWNVH55B6ZCGFR7RB32EYFRXAVCNFSM6AAAAABSVMM7D6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDKMRZGU4DSOBQHA>
.
You are receiving this because you were assigned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
Sampling error correction does not appear to impact the adaptive inflation updates.
The value of the sampling error correction is read from the table in subroutine update_from_obs_inc in assim_tools_mod.f90. It is then used to modify the value of the reg_coef which is subsequently multiplied by the obs_inc to get the state_inc which is returned. The updated value of the reg_coef is also returned to the calling location in subroutine obs_updates_ens. However, the reg_coef is a local variable array in obs_update_ens and is not returned from this subroutine. Subroutine update_varying_state_space_inflation does not make any use of the sampling error correction table. It seems like it would be appropriate to apply sampling error correction to reduce the strength of the relation between the observation and state variable when updating the inflation, too.
The current behavior has been unchanged since the original implementation of the adaptive inflation algorithms. Should we update the behavior to include the use of sampling error correction, or should we document that it is not being done?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: