You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am a big fan of the project and want to see it succeed. As with any other project, to ensure a good dev velocity, there need to be some funds set aside for development. Very often this takes the form of a dev wallet or basis points of mined blocks. However, most exchanges need this amount to be less than 5% (either <5% of current circulating supply set aside in dev wallet or dev fee < 5%).
Seeing as the current scheme is a dev fee of 10%, I think it would be better to reduce it to the 3% range in order to facilitate more listings. This will eventually lead to greater liquidity and adoption, increasing the value of the current holdings. Everybody wins in this scheme. Please do consider this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I am a big fan of the project and want to see it succeed. As with any other project, to ensure a good dev velocity, there need to be some funds set aside for development. Very often this takes the form of a dev wallet or basis points of mined blocks. However, most exchanges need this amount to be less than 5% (either <5% of current circulating supply set aside in dev wallet or dev fee < 5%).
Seeing as the current scheme is a dev fee of 10%, I think it would be better to reduce it to the 3% range in order to facilitate more listings. This will eventually lead to greater liquidity and adoption, increasing the value of the current holdings. Everybody wins in this scheme. Please do consider this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: