-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rework starting perks assignment logic + New starting perks & rebalance/rework old ones #51
Comments
Would be nice to either supply the perks with meta information so that they can be given to a soldier only if they have certain specs (Pretorian is pretty useless if the soldier can't use a melee weapon with Weapon Restrictions, although you could carry a utility slot melee weapon, I suppose, or get a melee attack from other sources). Alternatively, perhaps all specs should be made equally useful to all weapon categories. |
Absolutely agree. To that end, I think it would also be useful/necessary if/that SWO setups that limit your specializations but let you choose your starting perks would reverse the order of spec assignment/choice and starting perks choice so you could base your choice of perks on the specs. This would require the assigned/chosen specs to be visible in the starting perk selection screen UI. |
Another thing is overlap caused by RPGO plugins, but I'm not sure thats a solvable issue. For example, Runner is +3 mobility, while there's a perk in the samurai pack that give +3 mobility and +20 dodge. Note that you can also roll both of them, for a soldier with +6 mobility, which might also create issues, but that is admittedly a function of the Samurai Specialization plugin. I also find myself unimpressed with perks like Marksman or Preatorian due to their smaller impact when compared to perks like Irregular that encourage unique soldier interactions even with the same trees, and would feel that similar perks could arguably be consolidated into more impactful ones. A character who does not wield a bullpup having a very solid overwatch perk is interesting and unique. |
This was actually originally intended. Before the SWO were added to RPGO, each soldier got exactly one stronger and more impactful "Aptitude" perk and one weaker, more general use "Squaddie" perk. The issue is that with Origins, both types of perks are thrown into one pool you can freely choose from. The rework will likely address this issue in some fashion. |
@bstar1million Would it be possible to color code the perks in these two categories so users could balance their own games accordingly? IE only take one of each? I know the SuperSoldiers RPGO addon has color coded specs. Just a thought. |
Hey there people, I'm new to the modding community (don't know how to mod) and so I don't really know how difficult these would be to implement. However, from the perspective of a gamer who loves starting perks that significantly alter the way a character plays, without pigeonholing them into specific roles, these are my ideas so far. Note: I've recently started using the "choose starting perks" function, and I've had a lot of fun making really different and unique characters. But I'd love more options. Feel free to be brutal with feedback, I know I won't see things other people instantly see as balance or gameplay issues (not to mention power creep). I think most of these ideas can be balanced, I'm assuming an amount of testing/balancing would be required. Focused on the Kill Heavy Grenades Makeshift Grapple Heavy Delivery Boils and Pustules NOTE: The above idea comes from wanting mines earlier in the game, I thought this could be an interesting and fun way to do that. Please give feedback on this. I think the health cost is fair, and will be useful by any soldier in the early and late game due to the acid effect. Krav Maga Sting Long sighted Blind but no deaf I love the work you modders do, thank you SO much! |
I generally agree with the issues presented so far. I think all perks need to be balanced against each other, even if they are in different pools. I think the best solution to that would be to make all passives that are currently stronger stat-wise have some sort of condition or downside. For example: One thing i would also like to bring up is the balance of squad effects as squaddie perks. I think these are a bit too strong as bonuses (Kingpin, Overseer, War Hero, Pacifist?), and really annoying when they are penalties (Student of the Blade groan, its particularly bad because you always forget it). I would really inquire that those are looked at and reworked to bring their values in line or make them work in a different way. |
I agree with Chris, and with what most other people here have said. Warden could also be +20 on overwatch, -10 aim on non reaction shots |
One major issue that I would like to address with this rework is to ensure that each soldier gets abilities that are useful to their build (e.g. not a melee ability if they can't even use melee weapons). There are basically two options to achieve this: (1) Make all starting perks super generic so they provide benefits no matter your build and loadout Another change/feature that I think would make sense (perhaps as a separate SWO?) is this: |
While / if /when reworking the starting perks system, it might be worthwhile to add a weighting system for the starting perks. |
I want to streamline and improve the icons, localization and gameplay effects of the current selection of starting/squaddie/aptitude/origin perks and perhaps add new ones.
Please use this issue for suggestions, ideas, thoughts etc. (no guarantee they will be incorporated).
Additional features that might be worthwhile:
(A) change nothing, because people can choose fitting specs for their rolled starting perks or
(B) roll starting perks after specs were chosen and use meta information for each perk (that needs it because it requires specific items/weapons) like
bMelee
and only make perks eligible for the random roll(s) that the soldier can make use of with their chosen specializations.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: