Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feature_request: increase STORAGE_SIZE_LIMIT #1664

Closed
martines3000 opened this issue Aug 8, 2023 · 5 comments
Closed

feature_request: increase STORAGE_SIZE_LIMIT #1664

martines3000 opened this issue Aug 8, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@martines3000
Copy link

Increase the STORAGE_SIZE_LIMIT to 200MB (209715200 bytes).

This would allow snaps that require larger datasets to load them on the first startup (fetch from remote server) and store them locally. This dramatically reduces the snaps bundle size and improves the cold start (wake up) times.

We are experiencing this issue because we are using Polygon ID circuits (the size is approximately 127 Mb).

This would resolve our problem.

@martines3000
Copy link
Author

@FrederikBolding Any updates/information on this ?

@FrederikBolding
Copy link
Member

@martines3000 Sorry for the radio silence, we are still discussing internally. I'll try to get an update for you soon!

@martines3000
Copy link
Author

@FrederikBolding Any new updates/information on this ?

@FrederikBolding
Copy link
Member

@martines3000 Sorry for the lack of response, we aren't sure yet whether we can increase the storage limit much more. It also feels like a slightly hacky solution. Would an API like the one I suggested in #1778 be useful to your use-case? I'm wondering if you could bundle the auxiliary files needed for the snaps and lazy load them as needed?

@kenhkan
Copy link

kenhkan commented Jan 19, 2024

Closing this as this is no longer an issue now that we have File API support. Please feel free to re-open if you think File API support does not address your use case.

@kenhkan kenhkan closed this as completed Jan 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants