Redesign Ascertain Pedigrees to better fit actual researcher workflow #260
Labels
Ascertain Pedigrees
Part of the Ascertain Pedigrees feature and prioritized accordingly
design issue
Something to noodle before any action taken
enhancement
New feature or request
FDD
Foundational Document / Decision - issue with record/reference of a major design decision being made
UX design
UX design issue; may need discussion, may need DW involvement
Milestone
While release-candidate-testing the Ascertain Pedigrees subsystem, Jake ran into an issue in which he was trying to create a "pedigree cohort" with no "affecteds". I didn't know if this made sense or not, and opted to reach out to Veronica. What I got back was a tremendously useful primer on researcher workflow that this is intended for:
The refinements we're ACTUALLY doing for initial public release are being detailed in a different issue (since this prompted a pretty extensive discussion as to what we could and could not do in the timeframe, and we settled on something that would fit); I'll post here when I have that written up. At the time she posted the primer, tho, Veronica also included this:
The first element (all pedigrees with 0 affecteds) is doable. The other two are an intriguging idea but would require a lot more development time, and so are being shelved at least for the initial public release. What I really want to do, though, is have some time to go out into the wilderness with this in mind and come back with a better overall design that fits the workflow - right now we can create something that technically lets you accomplish what we're after, but it doesn't really smoothly enable it. I want smooth enabling, if we can pull it off.
So that's what this issue is about. A general redesign of the UX of this module. I want to take the time to pin this down and Get It Right. And I absolutely want to do it for the Second Public Release - preferably, I'd have it for the initial, but I don't think we have the time to pull it off. :( But Veronica makes a good point about how that's a big part of the unique value proposition of DIVER:
So yes, release for its own sake, but once I have breathing room I want to give this thing the love it deserves now that I actually know what it's supposed to be doing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: