You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I noticed that the built-in reverse function gets very slow as soon as the matrix gets bigger (say 10x10 +).
Please excuse that I'm not very deep into the math behind your or other implementations and possible differences, but using i.E. this Gauss algorithm implementation the operation runs magnitudes faster: https://gist.github.com/unix1/7510208
Maybe it should be considered adding that, even if only as an alternative / second inverse function.
Cheers
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
I noticed that the built-in
reverse
function gets very slow as soon as the matrix gets bigger (say 10x10 +).Please excuse that I'm not very deep into the math behind your or other implementations and possible differences, but using i.E. this Gauss algorithm implementation the operation runs magnitudes faster: https://gist.github.com/unix1/7510208
Maybe it should be considered adding that, even if only as an alternative / second inverse function.
Cheers
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: