You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Why do total errors compared to the reference output have to be in the range 32% ± 6% in order to consider a run as successful? How was this range chosen?
I would be grateful if anyone could share any explanation or reference to the literature about the above.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I am Andreas Triantafyllos from Huawei and I would like to ask for some clarification about the evaluation of a simulation.
I was wondering if there are specific references that explain the criteria to consider a simulation run as successful.
In particular, I am referring to:
miniMD/ref/run_one_test
Lines 131 to 132 in 7576016
How was the formula that takes into account the precision of floating-point numbers derived?
and
miniMD/ref/run_one_test
Line 138 in 7576016
Why do total errors compared to the reference output have to be in the range 32% ± 6% in order to consider a run as successful? How was this range chosen?
I would be grateful if anyone could share any explanation or reference to the literature about the above.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: