You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
It is easy to make a typo, and instead of editing an attribute of the moves object, you actually add an extra attribute (and do not make the intended edit). Example:
moves = Moves()
moves.cbmc_n_dihed = 15
# This is what I might try to do...but with a typo,
moves.cmbc_n_dihed = 15
# No error or warning is thrown, so I think I've modified cbmc_n_dihed,
# but actually it still has the default value
Describe the solution you'd like system and moves have well defined attributes. The users can in some cases edit those attributes, but I see no need to add additional attributes. It would be good to throw an error if the user tries to create a new attribute.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Open to ideas, none come to mind immediately.
Other information
In some ways this is related to #49; now that we are closing in on the desired UX for MoSDeF Cassandra, it may be time to think about creating a somewhat more robust backend.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
It is easy to make a typo, and instead of editing an attribute of the moves object, you actually add an extra attribute (and do not make the intended edit). Example:
Describe the solution you'd like
system
andmoves
have well defined attributes. The users can in some cases edit those attributes, but I see no need to add additional attributes. It would be good to throw an error if the user tries to create a new attribute.Describe alternatives you've considered
Open to ideas, none come to mind immediately.
Other information
In some ways this is related to #49; now that we are closing in on the desired UX for MoSDeF Cassandra, it may be time to think about creating a somewhat more robust backend.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: