You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If the uuid/id really do refer to the presumed parent event, they should be described that way... If they are actually attributes of the attribute (meta-attribute?) the noun should be updated. :)
It would be good to clarify the relationship between id and uuid ... is the id locally unique within a given installation, but likely to change if an object is sent to a different org? Is the uuid expected to stay the same under such a situation?
Edit: I read a bit more, the answer is yes. :)
Yup, clarification would be welcome. I get a lot of "Duplicate UUID found in attribute" in my logs. I think because I try to use the same UUID (for the same attribute) in a different event (from the same manifest.json). I would expect that if the attribute is the same (an IP address in this case) the UUID could stay the same.
Maybe a hint could be added on how to best create an attribute UUID.
Is it org UUID, event UUID and attribute value?
e.g.
misp-rfc/misp-core-format/raw.md.txt
Line 476 in 0d37c82
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: