Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Referring to multiple specs for a given mapping/output #16

Open
anarchivist opened this issue Nov 10, 2014 · 2 comments
Open

Referring to multiple specs for a given mapping/output #16

anarchivist opened this issue Nov 10, 2014 · 2 comments

Comments

@anarchivist
Copy link

Hi there, is there recommended way to define a combination of MARCspecs to indicate multiple applicable matches? Solrmarc and Traject both use a colon to delimit multiple specs.

Examples:

  • If I wanted to refer to both fields 506 and 540, it would be nice to be able to do something like 506:540.
  • A slightly more complex example, using subSpecs: 650$z:650$a:034{LDR/6=\e}:255{LDR/6=\e}
@cKlee
Copy link
Contributor

cKlee commented Nov 17, 2014

Hi! I'm not sure if this should be described by the spec or leave it to the application. I mean why determine such a delimiter and not leave it to the flavor of the application (colon, pipe, whitespace are all possible). On the other hand there may be some use cases for exchanging such combinations. So why not if this is a real requirement. Are you planing to implement MARCspec?

@anarchivist
Copy link
Author

Yes, we are considering building a MARCspec implementation, perhaps based upon Traject and ruby-marc. I'd also be interested in perhaps contributing a Python implementation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants