You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
aes_encrypt() symbol is a common one, wolfssl and/or some other ssl modules appear to define the same symbol.
Would it be acceptable to rename the public functions in aes.h to add a 'lora_' prefix? like lora_aes_encrypt()?
If so I can open a PR with said change.
I'm guessing there may be ways to fix this with various build options but that seemed like a significant amount of additional effort, although fewer changes to the stack here.
Thoughts? We'd like to not carry any local changes around (and today we've renamed aes_encrypt() to lora_aes_encrypt() to resolve this issue).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
aes_encrypt() symbol is a common one, wolfssl and/or some other ssl modules appear to define the same symbol.
Would it be acceptable to rename the public functions in aes.h to add a 'lora_' prefix? like lora_aes_encrypt()?
If so I can open a PR with said change.
I'm guessing there may be ways to fix this with various build options but that seemed like a significant amount of additional effort, although fewer changes to the stack here.
Thoughts? We'd like to not carry any local changes around (and today we've renamed aes_encrypt() to lora_aes_encrypt() to resolve this issue).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: