Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EDDE does not fully incorporate the motions #543

Closed
miabonardi opened this issue Mar 1, 2024 · 4 comments · Fixed by #642
Closed

EDDE does not fully incorporate the motions #543

miabonardi opened this issue Mar 1, 2024 · 4 comments · Fixed by #642
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working EDDE motions Priority

Comments

@miabonardi
Copy link
Contributor

In the currently live version, because skip undefined is on, the motions generated by EDDE right now have missing variables. The individual motion interview orders are not run.

We need to add something like this:

  if wants_discovery and not original_hearing_date_past: 
    motion_to_shorten_time_order
   
  if original_hearing_date_past:
    motion_for_leave_to_file_order

Will wait for #541 to be merged because the motion file was renamed and want to avoid conflicts.

@miabonardi miabonardi added bug Something isn't working motions EDDE labels Mar 1, 2024
@miabonardi miabonardi changed the title EDDE does not actually incorporate the motions EDDE does not fully incorporate the motions Mar 1, 2024
@tobyfey
Copy link
Collaborator

tobyfey commented Mar 1, 2024

We should add those questions to the review block too.

@miabonardi
Copy link
Contributor Author

I was thinking for now we could add it after Discovery just to get them completed. What do you think? We might be able to also reference the motion specific review screens in the file_a_motion.yml.

@miabonardi
Copy link
Contributor Author

file_a_motion.yml has enable_al_nav_sections = True in it and if I include file_a_motion.yml in MOHUDEvictionProject.yml it overrides the entire interview. Setting enable_al_nav_sections = False doesn't fix it

miabonardi added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 1, 2024
@tobyfey
Copy link
Collaborator

tobyfey commented Jul 2, 2024

The Motion to Set Aside Judgment requires a final judgment to be made, which isn't really asked in the initial hearing. Should we ask this? Is it the same as somebody entering a hearing date in the past?

@tobyfey tobyfey self-assigned this Jul 3, 2024
This was referenced Jul 31, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working EDDE motions Priority
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants