You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the currently live version, because skip undefined is on, the motions generated by EDDE right now have missing variables. The individual motion interview orders are not run.
We need to add something like this:
if wants_discovery and not original_hearing_date_past:
motion_to_shorten_time_order
if original_hearing_date_past:
motion_for_leave_to_file_order
Will wait for #541 to be merged because the motion file was renamed and want to avoid conflicts.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I was thinking for now we could add it after Discovery just to get them completed. What do you think? We might be able to also reference the motion specific review screens in the file_a_motion.yml.
file_a_motion.yml has enable_al_nav_sections = True in it and if I include file_a_motion.yml in MOHUDEvictionProject.yml it overrides the entire interview. Setting enable_al_nav_sections = False doesn't fix it
The Motion to Set Aside Judgment requires a final judgment to be made, which isn't really asked in the initial hearing. Should we ask this? Is it the same as somebody entering a hearing date in the past?
In the currently live version, because skip undefined is on, the motions generated by EDDE right now have missing variables. The individual motion interview orders are not run.
We need to add something like this:
Will wait for #541 to be merged because the motion file was renamed and want to avoid conflicts.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: