We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
If one bundles version 2 like this: cd src && bun build --target browser --outfile ../blissv2.js index.js
cd src && bun build --target browser --outfile ../blissv2.js index.js
would this be enough to create a valid non-esm/non-module version functionally equivalent to v1 shy, apart from the eventlistener-stuff?
--- blissv2.js 2024-04-18 11:58:12.194323965 +0000 +++ blissv2nomodule.js 2024-04-18 12:23:03.179546453 +0000 @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ +;(function() { var __defProp = Object.defineProperty; var __export = (target, all) => { for (var name in all) @@ -780,9 +781,5 @@ add: add_default }); var src_default = $_default; -export { - src_default as default, - $_default as Bliss, - $$_default as $$, - $_default as $ -}; +window.Bliss=$_default; +})();
?
Regards, Uwe
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Why do something like this and not just use rollup? I'd totally accept a PR that adds rollup to the repo itself.
Do note that bliss.global.js is a more standard name for this.
bliss.global.js
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
If one bundles version 2 like this:
cd src && bun build --target browser --outfile ../blissv2.js index.js
would this be enough to create a valid non-esm/non-module version functionally equivalent to v1 shy, apart from the eventlistener-stuff?
?
Regards, Uwe
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: