The following template is useful for submitting a use case issue for LD4 Reconciliation Working Group. If you are doing that, just delete this introductory text and fill in the sections below. Feel free to add free narrative wherever and however you think will best clarify or enrich your use case. If you are adding another kind of issue, you can just delete this whole template to start with a blank form.
You can see the use cases gathered here: https://github.com/LD4P/ld4-community-recon/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3Ause-case
If you're worried your use case isn't in scope, or is too narrow/broad, or other, please submit it anyway. We want to perform a wide capture of how people in GLAM institutions work on, around, with, or without reconciliation and entity resolution for their (meta)data. Thanks!
If you are having issues with GitHub, you can also email your issue to Christina.
Who are is the person chiefly engaged in this activity? E.g. a library patron, a cataloger, a repository developer, a technician...
Whom and what does this use case affect? E.g. a single patron, my institution, my regional consortium, etc.
What is actually happening in this use case? What does the actor begin with? What do they finish with? How do we know they were successful?