wine ge custom vs wine format

[ghost]

I'm using your wine and proton builds with bin share lib format. This works perfectly in batocera (thanks!), but seeing a lot of requests for ge builds. When I extracted them they are split into lib and lib64 and they don't seem to run. It seems to be they are using different libraries perhaps?

e.g. logs say wine: could not load ntdll.so: libunwind.so.8: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory etc.

Was wondering if you were familiar with the differences

[Kron4ek]

I'm aware that wine-ge uses two separate directories for 32-bit and 64-bit libraries, but that's not a problem.

e.g. logs say wine: could not load ntdll.so: libunwind.so.8: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory etc.

You can solve this problem by installing libunwind into your system, not sure if batocera allows to install packages though.

It seems to be they are using different libraries perhaps?

They are compiled in a different build environment, i think this is why my builds do not require libunwind.so.8, but wine-ge does.

[ghost]

the base system is immutable except the userdata similar to conty, and there's no package manager since its baked on buildroot. I've seen some crazy workarounds though.