Using dwarfs instead of squashfs?

[Phantop]

So dwarfs is essentially squashfs but with generally better compression and performance. I recall seeing @Kron4ek on the issue regarding offset support, so I assumed there was some intention for Conty to use it at some point?

I've personally been using it as a replacement for appimages via a small script I made called appdwarf. Have not run into any major issues with offset support, even when using the automatic offset functionality. I think it would be a good idea to either offer an alternative version (of coure if you're willing to put the time in) or switch over entirely, as this is generally rather stable in my experience, while offering smaller sizes and better performance.

[Kron4ek]

Added dwarfs support with 8292d05. The next release will additionally offer dwarfs-compressed images. For now dwarfs will be available as an additional option, but maybe i will switch to it completely in the future.

[bayazidbh]

Since DwarFS version seems to be here to stay, maybe the utils_size variable can be separated between size for squashfs and dwarfs? Or maybe it can be declared in the create-conty.sh?