You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
CHEBI:24632 is hydrocarbon -- but doesn't sound right as a location, so something is off here. I think this is from Madin et al. traits.csv but the closest term I see in the raw file is "hydrocarbon_degradation" but this is for a 'metabolism' and not location.
Actually all of isolation_source data (from BacDive) is in the wrong orientation semantically -- let's just change the predicate to 'located_in' and keep the taxon as the subject.
Actually all of isolation_source data (from BacDive) is in the wrong orientation semantically -- let's just change the predicate to 'located_in' and keep the taxon as the subject.
I don't see either CURIEs in the Bacdive transform.
We have two different CHEBI's for location of:
CHEBI:33290
CHEBI:24632
One of these is in the opposite orientation:
urn:uuid:787caa6b-dd79-479c-b730-cb19a11ac3b2 CHEBI:24632 biolink:location_of NCBITaxon:930171 RO:0001015 Graph
urn:uuid:2ca87a3f-ecdb-4f81-b0e3-b61d43e71928 NCBITaxon:1441714 biolink:location_of CHEBI:33290 RO:0001015 Graph
CHEBI:24632 is hydrocarbon -- but doesn't sound right as a location, so something is off here. I think this is from Madin et al. traits.csv but the closest term I see in the raw file is "hydrocarbon_degradation" but this is for a 'metabolism' and not location.
Actually all of isolation_source data (from BacDive) is in the wrong orientation semantically -- let's just change the predicate to 'located_in' and keep the taxon as the subject.
@bsantan @hrshdhgd
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: