You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Automated workers still use this same tool dialog:
However, in some instances, the various options presented may not be relevant. For example, for the "Connect sequential" worker, which connects objects to each other, the "Annotation configuration" and "Advanced options" are not relevant. Perhaps we can control these with labels on the docker image. For instance: "annotationConfigurationPanel=False" and "advancedOptionsPanel=False" would turn these two panels off. If they are not set, then it uses the default.
Also, the naming could be overridden. Right now, it tries to autoname based on the tags. However, for connect sequential, this again is not right. We could control this with "defaultToolName=Connect sequential" or something like that, and if the label is not set, then it just does the default behavior.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Automated workers still use this same tool dialog:
However, in some instances, the various options presented may not be relevant. For example, for the "Connect sequential" worker, which connects objects to each other, the "Annotation configuration" and "Advanced options" are not relevant. Perhaps we can control these with labels on the docker image. For instance: "annotationConfigurationPanel=False" and "advancedOptionsPanel=False" would turn these two panels off. If they are not set, then it uses the default.
Also, the naming could be overridden. Right now, it tries to autoname based on the tags. However, for connect sequential, this again is not right. We could control this with "defaultToolName=Connect sequential" or something like that, and if the label is not set, then it just does the default behavior.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: