Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

editPolicy examples in UG are inaccurate and not functional #11

Open
KevinEyo1 opened this issue Apr 14, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

editPolicy examples in UG are inaccurate and not functional #11

KevinEyo1 opened this issue Apr 14, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@KevinEyo1
Copy link
Owner

KevinEyo1 commented Apr 14, 2023

image.png

Directly copying to use will fail and throw error message

@KevinEyo1 KevinEyo1 changed the title editPolicy examples are inaccurate and not functional editPolicy examples in UG are inaccurate and not functional Apr 14, 2023
@nus-pe-bot
Copy link

nus-pe-bot commented Apr 17, 2023

Team's Response

No details provided by team.

The 'Original' Bug

[The team marked this bug as a duplicate of the following bug]

editPolicy: UG example states "editpolicy" which does not work

In the UG example shown below, it uses "editpolicy", but only "editPolicy" works in the app. As such, the example command does not work in the app.

image.png

image.png


[original: nus-cs2103-AY2223S2/pe-interim#2570] [original labels: severity.Low type.DocumentationBug]

Their Response to the 'Original' Bug

[This is the team's response to the above 'original' bug]

my bad

Items for the Tester to Verify

❓ Issue duplicate status

Team chose to mark this issue as a duplicate of another issue (as explained in the Team's response above)

  • I disagree

Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]


❓ Issue severity

Team chose [severity.Low]
Originally [severity.Medium]

  • I disagree

Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]


Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants