Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Searching by investigator is more difficult now for investigators with multiple releases #699

Open
danharel opened this issue Feb 10, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@danharel
Copy link

First, I'd like to just say that I love the new UI for the "Cards used" search:

Image
It looks very elegant and clean.

However this update has actually had the unintended consequence of making it harder to search in the following way. Previously, if you typed in e.g. "Dexter Drake", it would give you 2 results in the dropdown, both of which appearing identical, both of which returning the same results¹. However, now, these 2 results are distinct and thus return distinct results. Example:

First Dexter: Image

Second Dexter: Image

As you can see, they return completely different decks, even though the 2 versions are functionally identical. Now if a user wants to search for decks that use Dexter Drake, they need to perform 2 separate searches. This also loses the ability to sort the two sets of decks against each other (e.g. a user can sort by Popularity within a version, but would be unable to tell which is the most popular between the 2 sets).

This also applies to Silas Bank and Gloria (though there are no Drowned City Gloria decks yet, so that one doesn't matter as much). I'm not sure if there are other examples.

Worth noting, this thankfully does not apply to Revised Core Set cards. Despite them similarly being rereleased with functionally identical versions, the search does unify them under the original version

¹ I'm actually not certain that this was the previous behavior. Either way though, the current behavior should be unified

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant