We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RegistryTools exports one type and three functions:
There are seven packages in General depending on RegistryTools. Ignoring the exported symbols, they also make use of the following:
RegistryCache
registrator_errors
gitcmd
RegistryData
write_registry
ReturnStatus
haserror
Compress.load
RegisterParams
package_relpath
get_stdlib_name
stdlibs
Compress.compress
Compress.save
Would it seem reasonable to simply define the public API as the union of the listed symbols and add docstrings to the ones which don't have one?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
RegistryTools exports one type and three functions:
There are seven packages in General depending on RegistryTools.
Ignoring the exported symbols, they also make use of the following:
RegistryCache
,registrator_errors
.gitcmd
.gitcmd
,RegistryData
,write_registry
,ReturnStatus
,haserror
,Compress.load
.RegisterParams
.package_relpath
,get_stdlib_name
,stdlibs
,Compress.compress
,Compress.load
.Compress.load
,Compress.save
.Would it seem reasonable to simply define the public API as the union of the listed symbols and add docstrings to the ones which don't have one?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: