== method ambiguities with Base julia

[rafaqz]

== with an Any argument is ambiguous with == on Missing and WeakRef. Maybe specific methods for those types can be added here for AbstractThunk?

Otherwise Aqua.jl ambiguity testing is broken for all dependent packages.

See:
SimonDanisch/AbstractNumbers.jl#16
with CI breaking for ChainRulesCore ambiguities here:
https://github.com/SimonDanisch/AbstractNumbers.jl/runs/5208526811?check_suite_focus=true#step:5:106

[devmotion]

Otherwise Aqua.jl ambiguity testing is broken for all dependent packages.

You can specify recursive=false to only check ambiguities in your packages: https://juliatesting.github.io/Aqua.jl/dev/#Aqua.test_ambiguities-Tuple{Any}

[rafaqz]

Unfortunately that doesn't seem to work. But you can use exclude=[(==)] instead.

[nsajko]

Neither Aqua.test_all(ChainRulesCore) nor detect_ambiguities(ChainRulesCore, recursive=true) show == as ambiguous any more, although there are other ambiguous methods. So I guess this issue can be closed.