-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Regarding citing this tool #18
Comments
Please see my new |
Hi, @parnika26 , please let me know once your paper is published. Wish you good luck! |
Hi Keren,
Yes sure will inform you :)
I really felt very nice working with you.
Hope to work with you again in the future.
Thank you so much for the support and help you have given so far :)
…On Nov 22, 2017 1:50 AM, "Keren Zhou" ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi, @parnika26 <https://github.com/parnika26> , please let me know once
your paper is published.
Wish you good luck!
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#18 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AQCLAlhJR5NZDQFGT0yf_rdv8ZcnwOwPks5s4zCqgaJpZM4Qi7wu>
.
|
Hi Keren, I have gone through the opened issue of directed graph support by gBolt. There you mentioned about one python code which can mine the subgraphs from directed graphs. However, correctness is not ensured by the author of the code. Also, I found that gBolt is more accurate and efficient as compared to python version. Appreciate your help in advance. |
@parnika26 , Thanks for the comment! I do know adding direct edge support is meaningful, but the problem is I really do not have spare time to handle this issue. I have a pile of on-goning projects and homeworks this term. Adding the support is always on my schedule, whereas I cannot gaurantee when I could finish it right now. |
Hi Keren,
Thank u so much for ur quick response. Yeah I can understand that you must
be preoccupied with lot of work.
However, can you help me in making the required changes for directed graphs?
If you know the workaround for the changes then can you please share it
with me?
Appreciate your help in advance.
Regards,
Parnika
On Feb 14, 2018 4:53 AM, "Keren Zhou" <[email protected]> wrote:
@parnika26 <https://github.com/parnika26> , Thanks for the comment!
I do know adding direct edge support is meaningful, but the problem is I
really do not have spare time to handle this issue. I have a pile of
on-goning projects and homeworks this term.
Adding the support is always on my schedule, whereas I cannot gaurantee
when I could finish it right now.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#18 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AQCLAkcOM_zaw7kaCVhlsUQPznZMHU3Sks5tUhlxgaJpZM4Qi7wu>
.
|
Hi Keren,
I want to cite your gBolt tool in my paper.
Can you please let me know if there is any paper of yours on gBolt so that I can cite it?
If there is no paper available on gBolt then can you please let me know how to cite your tool in the paper?
Thank you so much in advance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: