-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
/
Copy pathConvNeXt model
83 lines (64 loc) · 6.77 KB
/
ConvNeXt model
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
From https://levelup.gitconnected.com/convnext-in-search-of-the-last-convolutional-layer-da801d9f123b
## What is ConvNeXt model
The ConvNeXt model is a neural network architecture that undergoes a series of transformations and improvements compared to the original ResNet-50.
These changes are applied to enhance the model's accuracy and computational efficiency.
Macro Design Adjustments:
Changes in the computation distribution ratio (3:4:6:3) to a new ratio (3:3:9:3) in the stages, leading to improved accuracy.
Introduction of a "patchify" layer in the stem, downsampling the image by dividing it into smaller patches.
ResNeXt-ify Transformation:
Incorporation of the ResNeXt concept, extending residual networks with grouped convolutions to increase network width and capacity.
Increase in network width to match Swin-T's number of channels, resulting in improved accuracy with increased FLOPs.
Inverted Bottleneck Design:
Adoption of an inverted bottleneck design where the hidden dimension inside a block is larger than the input dimension.
Reduction of whole network FLOPs despite an increased FLOPs for the depthwise convolution layer, leading to slightly improved performance.
Large Kernel Integration:
Reintroduction of larger kernels in the vision landscape, inspired by Vision Transformers (ViTs).
Experimentation with various kernel sizes, with a preference for a 7x7 kernel size.
Micro Design Enhancements:
Replacement of ReLU activation with GELU, reducing GFLOPs without affecting accuracy.
Reduction of activation functions, normalization layers, and substitution of Batch Normalization (BN) with Layer Normalization (LN), contributing to improved accuracy.
Introduction of separate downsampling layers between stages, following the Swin Transformer approach, leading to significant accuracy gains.
The ConvNeXt model is designed to achieve high accuracy and computational efficiency by incorporating elements from different neural network architectures,
including ResNet, ResNeXt, and Vision Transformers.
The model undergoes a thoughtful process of adjustments and enhancements in both macro and micro designs to optimize its performance.
## Focus on ConvNeXt model vs different neural network architectures(like ResNet, ResNeXt, and Vision Transformers)
The ConvNeXt model differentiates itself from other neural network architectures,
including ResNet, ResNeXt, and Vision Transformers, through a series of key design choices and transformations.
Macro Design Adjustments:
ConvNeXt introduces changes in the computation distribution ratio in the stages, moving from the traditional ResNet ratio (3:4:6:3) to a new ratio (3:3:9:3).
This adjustment contributes to improved accuracy.
The incorporation of a "patchify" layer in the stem, inspired by Vision Transformers, sets the initial processing stage apart from the convolutional layer used in ResNets.
ResNeXt-ify Transformation:
ConvNeXt adopts the ResNeXt concept, extending the principles of residual networks by incorporating grouped convolutions.
This design allows the model to increase its width and capacity while maintaining computational efficiency.
The network width is increased to match the number of channels in Swin-T, resulting in improved accuracy with higher FLOPs.
Inverted Bottleneck Design:
ConvNeXt incorporates an inverted bottleneck design, starting with a narrower input, expanding it to a wider internal dimension, and then compressing it back to a narrower output.
This design choice differs from the standard bottleneck design used in architectures like ResNet.
Despite an increased FLOPs for the depthwise convolution layer, this change reduces the overall network FLOPs, leading to slightly improved performance.
Large Kernel Integration:
ConvNeXt reintroduces larger kernels in the vision landscape, inspired by Vision Transformers (ViTs), where larger kernel sizes (7x7) are used to capture global contextual information.
The design choice of using larger kernels is aligned with the benefits observed in ViTs, facilitating the capture of broader receptive fields.
Micro Design Enhancements:
ConvNeXt incorporates micro design enhancements such as the replacement of ReLU activation with GELU, reduction of activation functions,
normalization layers, and substitution of Batch Normalization (BN) with Layer Normalization (LN).
The introduction of separate downsampling layers between stages follows the Swin Transformer approach, resulting in significant accuracy gains.
Overall, ConvNeXt is characterized by a combination of macro and micro design adjustments, drawing inspiration from various successful architectures.
It integrates elements from ResNeXt, ResNet, and Vision Transformers to create a model that aims for high accuracy and computational efficiency in sequence processing tasks.
** What is Macro design?
Macro design, in the context of neural network architectures, refers to the high-level structural and organizational decisions made during the development of the model.
It involves choices regarding the overall architecture, layer arrangements, and the distribution of computational tasks across different sections of the network.
Macro design decisions can significantly impact the model's performance, efficiency, and capabilities.
In the provided context of the ConvNeXt model, macro design adjustments include changes to the computation distribution ratio and the introduction of a "patchify" layer in the stem.
Computation Distribution Ratio:
The term "ratio" is used to describe how computation tasks are divided among different sections or stages of a neural network.
In the case of the ConvNeXt model, adjustments are made to the ratio in the stages of the network. The traditional ResNet design had a specific ratio (3:4:6:3),
and ConvNeXt modifies it to a new ratio (3:3:9:3).
This adjustment is made empirically, based on experimental data and observations, aiming to improve the overall performance and accuracy of the model.
Introduction of "Patchify" Layer in the Stem:
The stem of a neural network refers to the initial layers that process the input data.
ConvNeXt introduces a "patchify" layer in the stem, which involves downsampling the input image by dividing it into smaller patches.
This change in the stem's design is inspired by Vision Transformers (ViTs) and represents a macro design choice to modify the initial processing stage of the network.
In summary, macro design decisions involve high-level choices that shape the overall structure and functionality of a neural network.
These decisions can impact the model's performance in terms of accuracy, efficiency, and the ability to handle specific types of data and tasks.
Adjustments to the computation distribution ratio and modifications in the stem's design are examples of macro design considerations in the context of ConvNeXt.