You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 19, 2018. It is now read-only.
I'm currently playing around with a backport of the android.transition package. To me, this seems like a perfect fit for inclusion into NineOldAndroids to give a more complete backward compatible animation library.
If it is indeed possible to backport the transition framework all the way back to Android 1.0 (and I've not looked into it enough to know if I can) then would you consider including these into NOA itself? Another option could be to create a new library which has a hard dependency on NOA to provide pre-honeycomb support.
Let me know what you think.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
But I saw that the code launches a RuntimeException on the translate element. The case is not handled by AnimatorInflator. Would your port solve it? I am definitely interested in it and I will be able to contribute.
I attempted to port the transition package. I had some success, but ran into a couple of issues due to two missing features: 1) ViewGroup.suppressLayout and 2) View.setTransitionAlpha. It doesn't use nine-old-androids, but could probably be modified fairly easily to use it for the animations instead.
I'm currently playing around with a backport of the android.transition package. To me, this seems like a perfect fit for inclusion into NineOldAndroids to give a more complete backward compatible animation library.
If it is indeed possible to backport the transition framework all the way back to Android 1.0 (and I've not looked into it enough to know if I can) then would you consider including these into NOA itself? Another option could be to create a new library which has a hard dependency on NOA to provide pre-honeycomb support.
Let me know what you think.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: