Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛 GA showing empty title in preview.gov.tools #2233

Open
bosko-m opened this issue Oct 25, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #2234
Open

🐛 GA showing empty title in preview.gov.tools #2233

bosko-m opened this issue Oct 25, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #2234
Assignees
Labels
🐛 Bug Something isn't working 🗳️ Voting Pillar

Comments

@bosko-m
Copy link
Contributor

bosko-m commented Oct 25, 2024

Area

Voting Pillar

Domain

preview.gov.tools

Which wallet were you using?

Any wallet

Context

I was trying to check details of the GAs on preview and I've realized there is one that has epoch boundaries set, but doesnt have a title nor an error.

Steps to reproduce

  1. Go to the list of Governance Actions

Actual behavior

There is no title on a specific one

Expected behavior

There should be error displayed in the case of invalid metadata (in this case its likely not CIP-0108 or CIP-119 compliant)

Screenshot 2024-10-25 at 09 38 13
@spannercode
Copy link
Contributor

spannercode commented Oct 25, 2024

The one with empty title seems to have title and other governance action metadata missing on the anchor URL.
Here is the link from preview.cardanoscan.io
https://preview.cardanoscan.io/govAction/gov_action19pq6tqg8v9n6qe30rd835w9uerhl8pheeezuxwhr8v07s2yauggqqx5sgly?tab=meta

Compared to other valid governance actions like this one:
https://preview.cardanoscan.io/govAction/gov_action1rarl8newf7gsn03wl6gc9jhqsvr72autml4zz58xjq7y3mw2pw8sqsymael?tab=meta

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🐛 Bug Something isn't working 🗳️ Voting Pillar
Projects
Status: No status
Status: In review
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants