Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

DOOH fields inconsistent in spec vs. implementation notes #49

Open
rkaw92 opened this issue Mar 20, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

DOOH fields inconsistent in spec vs. implementation notes #49

rkaw92 opened this issue Mar 20, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@rkaw92
Copy link

rkaw92 commented Mar 20, 2023

Hi,
We're trying to figure out how to correctly pass DOOH objects in OpenRTB 2.6, but it seems that the spec and the implementation guide differ on this. The spec says:

venuetype - string, array
venuetypetax | integer; default 1

But the implementation notes have this example:

        "venuetax": 1,
        "venuetypeid": 30101

So I assume one of these must be wrong. But which? 😅
@lm-pramod-jadhav
Copy link

we also observed the same discrepancy & about filing an issue.
is any update on this, Is anybody watching the issue?

@rkaw92 FYI, for now, we have assumed venuetypeid as a correct one.

Thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@rkaw92 @lm-pramod-jadhav