Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing GPP Extension? #114

Open
dtbarne opened this issue Dec 19, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Missing GPP Extension? #114

dtbarne opened this issue Dec 19, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@dtbarne
Copy link

dtbarne commented Dec 19, 2022

This document references the OpenRTB extensions in this repo:

Like other existing privacy signals (TCF and USPrivacy), the GPP string is also able to be transported via OpenRTB. This will be included in the Regs object in the November 2022 release. See this document for approved design prior to release.

However, there is no actual reference to GPP anywhere to be found, so far as I can tell. There is increasing pressure to support GPP by Jan 1, 2023, but I can't find any official information on the OpenRTB implementation.

Can anyone confirm the specification for OpenRTB 2.5? From some past proposals and discussion, I've gathered:

regs.ext.gpp (GPP string)
regs.ext.gpp_sid (array of relevant section IDs)

@hillslatt
Copy link
Contributor

What you laid out is correct for 2.5, but we strongly encourage moving to 2.6 which would only require a change to the version number in the header and the inclusion of regs.gpp and regs.gpp_sid. Hope that helps clarify!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants