-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Copy pathcaptions-en2.vtt
142 lines (107 loc) · 2.83 KB
/
captions-en2.vtt
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
WEBVTT
kind: captions
lang: en
1
000:00:00.000 --> 0:00:00.000
<span>Transcript (manually generated)</span>
2
00:00:41.700 --> 00:00:43.000
Yes, Mr Moore
3
00:00:43.800 --> 00:00:48.000
My Lords, I appear on behalf of uh, the appellant
4
00:00:48.034 --> 00:00:49.800
I'll refer to simply as 'A'
5
00:00:50.000 --> 00:00:51.800
Along with Mr Vasal Adams
6
00:00:52.200 --> 00:00:54.200
My learned friends: Mr Jonathan Crow...
7
00:00:55.200 --> 00:00:56.300
Mr Jason Copel
8
00:00:56.500 --> 00:00:59.200
appear for the respondent
9
00:00:59.300 --> 00:01:01.300
and my learned friends: Lord Panic and Mr Higgin
10
00:01:01.500 --> 00:01:03.800
uh, appear on behalf of justice
11
00:01:03.900 --> 00:01:06.300
as an intervener in this appeal.
12
000:01:08.200 --> 00:01:11.400
Lords, this is an appeal against a decision of the court of appeal
13
00:01:11.600 --> 00:01:13.600
of the 18th of February of this year,
14
00:01:14.300 --> 00:01:17.000
that the Administrative Court has no jurisdiction
15
00:01:18.300 --> 00:01:21.800
to hear proceedings brought by 'A' against the respondent
16
00:01:22.300 --> 00:01:26.600
pursuant to Section 7-1A of the Human Rights Act.
<!--00:01:22.300 --> 00:01:26.600
<span>--------- Demo transcript extract cut at this point - go to Chapter 2 Button above ------------------------------------</span>-->
17
00:01:27.800 --> 00:01:30.600
A is a former member of the security service
18
00:01:31.000 --> 00:01:35.600
and R is the director of establishments of security service.
19
00:01:36.500 --> 00:01:41.100
A has brought judicial review proceedings challenging
20
00:01:41.200 --> 00:01:45.300
R's respondent's refusal to authorise publication of a book
21
00:01:45.500 --> 00:01:48.300
he's written about his time in the service
22
00:01:48.500 --> 00:01:51.600
which he strongly believes should be published in the public interest.
23
00:01:52.500 --> 00:01:56.200
Without the authority from the respondents
24
00:01:56.500 --> 00:02:02.500
A's obligation of confidentiality bites, and he cannot publish.
25
00:02:03.500 --> 00:02:06.500
Lords, the jurisdiction issue arises because...
26
00:02:06.600 --> 00:02:10.200
in addition to challenging on traditional public law grounds
27
00:02:10.500 --> 00:02:12.500
of irrationality and bias
28
00:02:13.600 --> 00:02:17.500
A raised the claim that, the respondent's refusal of permission
29
00:02:17.500 --> 00:02:21.500
was unlawful in the sense identified in Section 6.1
30
00:02:21.500 --> 00:02:24.200
of the Human Rights Act 1998
31
00:02:24.500 --> 00:02:30.800
i.e. that the respondent as a public authority in refusing authority
32
00:02:31.000 --> 00:02:34.800
to publish, had acted in a way incompatible
33
00:02:34.800 --> 00:02:39.400
with A's conventional right to freedom of expression
34
00:02:39.600 --> 00:02:43.500
under Article 10 of the European Convention.