Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

User provisioning article update suggestions #123

Open
meneer opened this issue Jun 21, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

User provisioning article update suggestions #123

meneer opened this issue Jun 21, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@meneer
Copy link

meneer commented Jun 21, 2023

The article is still valid and complete.
Some suggestions for small updates to the article:

Introduction
‘the bedrock of any IAM system’
There are many IAM no-provisioning systems. Please use IGA instead of IAM.
IGA could be introduced (including synonyms like IAG - it is mentionwd in the What is... part)

What is...:
‘User provisioning is setting up the entitlements for users to the resources’

´User provisioning is setting up the accounts and entitlements for users to the resources' (the term user points to persons, so adding 'accounts' would be logical)

De-provisioning deserves a little more attention in the article (just one mention and a small paragraph about leavers. And almost everywhere we see issues in this department...

Business drivers:
Data quality should be added: The SoR-owner is accountable for identity and therefore account data. Data quality issues because of manual administration are big, resulting in lots of inefficiency remediation tasks.

User Provisioning:
Entitlement catalog: Lacking the concept of roles. Roles are mentioned only in the policy part.

Certification, or re-certification or attestation deserves a little more attention. 'Soll - Ist' could be used.

@hlflanagan hlflanagan added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 23, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants