Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Align narratives with D4D's repository #231

Open
samuele-mattiuzzo opened this issue Nov 11, 2019 · 5 comments
Open

Align narratives with D4D's repository #231

samuele-mattiuzzo opened this issue Nov 11, 2019 · 5 comments
Labels
standard management An issue that involves changing a core part of the IATI Standard

Comments

@samuele-mattiuzzo
Copy link
Contributor

samuele-mattiuzzo commented Nov 11, 2019

Some narratives have been clarified on D4D's Ruleset repository. We have to update the Reference Site on our end to match them.

This shouldn't happen, ideally, till we do bring the Reference Site under the Standard Website, but that piece of work is scheduled much further in the future so we have to at least keep consistent.

This will be done during the testing phase. People will be properly informed where the new narratives are and why there's discrepancy.

@samuele-mattiuzzo samuele-mattiuzzo changed the title Align narratives with D4D Align narratives with D4D's repository Nov 11, 2019
@stevieflow
Copy link

Some narratives have been clarified on D4D's Ruleset repository.

Just so I understand this correctly - is it therefore safe to assume that some of the rules have changed during the implementation of the validator?

It doesn't matter if there is a belief that there is no semantic change - we need to see such clarifications before any central documentation has the suggestion of being updated

PR such as #98 also seem to suggest some changes to the rulesets

This is quite concerning, given that the rulesets are within the SSOT and subject to strict change control

@samuele-mattiuzzo
Copy link
Contributor Author

No, it's not safe to assume they have CHANGED. The definitions have ben CLARIFIED, as in made a bit more understandable.

@stevieflow
Copy link

Appreciated @samuele-mattiuzzo - but I just don't feel comfortable with assumptions.

Are the changes / diffs that came from the clarifications written down?

@stevieflow
Copy link

Any news @samuele-mattiuzzo ?

@akmiller01 akmiller01 added standard management An issue that involves changing a core part of the IATI Standard and removed on hold enhancement labels Oct 26, 2022
@akmiller01
Copy link
Contributor

Keeping this open, but marking as "standard management" as it seems like there may be a question about the proper provenance of some rules.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
standard management An issue that involves changing a core part of the IATI Standard
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants