Replies: 4 comments 8 replies
-
Indeed, there must be a mistake inside punctuation. And like you: I never really understood, whether the energy_regeneration adds to energy_consumption or not. If you take the results of my car (already adjusted, due to your suggestion), you have the following totals:
If I add those two, assumed, that this is the correct point of view, I get
which then could be named as "new_total_energy_consumption". The longtime calculation of consumption/100km looks as follows:
This seems to be a reasonable result. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Based on my assuming, the following HA Template Sensor would reflect these arguments:
No warranties, Your own risk! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Ok, that is very strange.
Both values decrease, as I found not for the first time. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Found another project who says, values at bluelink are not reliable. But they have more entities listeted. Are they availiable at homeassistant, too? https://github.com/ZuinigeRijder/hyundai_kia_connect_monitor?tab=readme-ov-file#python-dailystatspy |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I'm trying to understand "Total Energy Consumption" and "Total Energy Regeneration". We own an HY-Kona long range bought in 2021.
Odometer: 53.206,8 km.
Total Energy Consumption: 1.136.874 Wh
Total Energy Regeneration: 429.913 Wh
Car battery capacity is 64kWh.
First in my opinion the Total Energy has the wrong measurement-unit. It should be 'Deka-Wh', what is very unusal.
If I calculate kwh/100km it is 1136kWh / 53206km * 100 = 2,135 kWh per 100km.
That would be nice but it is much less than possible. The 21,35 kWh per 100km seems a bit high but it is plausible.
If I calculate the count of loading-cycles it is 1136 kWh / 64 kWh = 17 cycles. Not plausible.
So the Total Energy Consumption must be 11.368.740 Wh. There is one digit missing at the entitiy.
Am I wrong? Do I miss something?
Second I try to understand how the values fit together. I track many loading-cycles, it is always below 21kWh per 100km I need from grid. Different loading points. And I know the consumption the Kona tells, it is between 14 kWh (summer) and 19 kWh (winter) per 100km.
So one see in the above calculation: The Total Energy Consumption divided by km is to hight.
If I calculate Total Energy Consumption - Total Energy Regeneration divided by km it is far to low.
1136874 deWh - 429913 deWh / 100 / 53206km * 100 = 13,288 kWh per 100km
So what do the values represent?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions