Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Custom network configuration via .env #714

Open
pkirsche opened this issue Aug 25, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Custom network configuration via .env #714

pkirsche opened this issue Aug 25, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@pkirsche
Copy link

Hello and first of all: THANKS!
Great project and great work.

Running puter within a docker compose enviroment, I run into an issue with networking. It seems that puter creates it's own network with a subnet of 192.168.80.x/20.
Unfortunately, within my setup, this network causes issues and I need to change the subnet somehow.

Is there any change to do this via enviromental variables (e.g. within .env) already?
If not, this would be a great option and would help me a lot.

@pkirsche pkirsche added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 25, 2024
@KernelDeimos
Copy link
Contributor

I believe this is related to Docker rather than Puter. Although, the subnet you mentioned is not Docker's default subnet range so I'm not sure what's happening here. What I do know is Puter itself does not create any network on the host OS.

@pkirsche
Copy link
Author

pkirsche commented Sep 2, 2024

Thanks for your reply @KernelDeimos
Indeed, the pre-chosen subnet 192.168.80.x/20 is not within the default docker subnet range. Thats what makes me believe, it comes from the container itself. I also don't have any DHCP server running which would and could deliver IPs from this subnet range.
So if it's insight the image, it would be a great improvement if the subnet could be configured via enviroment variable or other kind of way.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants