You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello. I'm trying neuralfingerprint, and have faced strange behaviour:
When i apply the model to csv file, which contains only smiles:
CCC
FFF
i get the result:
CCC,-3.4293943508031028
FCF,-2.6789522776231816
but when i put only CCC, i get another result.
CCC,-3.0120117325667533
If there are same molecules in input file, it gives same results for them, like:
CCC,-3.0120117325667533
CCC,-3.0120117325667533
The predictions are reproductable (dont change after another run), but the exact values depends on the contents of test csv file. I use your example.
smiles = read_smiles(task_params['experiment_data_file'])
result = predict_func(smiles)
I'm wondering if it is a bug or a feature.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I realize this is a bit annoying - there is a more sophisticated form of batch normalization that should give approximately the same results when applied to a single example, but we never implemented it. For simplicity's sake.
Hello. I'm trying neuralfingerprint, and have faced strange behaviour:
When i apply the model to csv file, which contains only smiles:
CCC
FFF
i get the result:
CCC,-3.4293943508031028
FCF,-2.6789522776231816
but when i put only CCC, i get another result.
CCC,-3.0120117325667533
If there are same molecules in input file, it gives same results for them, like:
CCC,-3.0120117325667533
CCC,-3.0120117325667533
The predictions are reproductable (dont change after another run), but the exact values depends on the contents of test csv file. I use your example.
I'm wondering if it is a bug or a feature.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: