Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add preconditioner to sparse solver #24

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Feb 14, 2025
Merged

Conversation

tyler-a-cox
Copy link
Collaborator

@tyler-a-cox tyler-a-cox commented Feb 14, 2025

This PR adds a preconditioner option to the sparse solver that is helpful for handling cases in which the input weights have large flagging gaps relative to the filter size or the weights are non-binary and frequency/time dependent. Here's comparison of the methods on a simulated case when the flagging mask has large gaps and frequency dependent non-zero weights.

Screenshot 2025-02-13 at 5 35 20 PM

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 14, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.03%. Comparing base (1403da3) to head (d7293e4).
Report is 9 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #24      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   99.01%   99.03%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files           4        4              
  Lines        1833     1869      +36     
==========================================
+ Hits         1815     1851      +36     
  Misses         18       18              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 99.03% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@tyler-a-cox tyler-a-cox force-pushed the precondition_sparse_solver branch from 81e2433 to 586a6f5 Compare February 14, 2025 01:31
@tyler-a-cox tyler-a-cox requested a review from jsdillon February 14, 2025 01:36
Copy link
Member

@jsdillon jsdillon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking good! just a few comments

@jsdillon jsdillon merged commit 49af74c into main Feb 14, 2025
8 checks passed
@jsdillon jsdillon deleted the precondition_sparse_solver branch February 14, 2025 02:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants