New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add support for missing values in SBM #4

Open

jchiquet opened this issue Aug 27, 2020 · 0 comments

Labels

Member

jchiquet commented Aug 27, 2020

The different possible solutions are

use the implementation of SimpleSBM in MultipartiteSBM from GREMLIN (handling missing values)
extend missSBM to various emission law
modify the C++ code in blockmodels to handle missing values

jchiquet added the enhancement label

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment