Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add utility processing algorithms #98

Closed
nmaarnio opened this issue Mar 13, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #141
Closed

Add utility processing algorithms #98

nmaarnio opened this issue Mar 13, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #141
Labels
Processing algorithms Feature/issue related to QGIS processing algorithms

Comments

@nmaarnio
Copy link
Collaborator

We could add the following functionalities as processing algorithms:

  • Split input multiband raster into singleband rasters
  • Combine rasters (singleband and multiband) into one. Requires that all rasters have same grid properties
  • Harmonize nodata. This would take multiple rasters and convert all of them to use same value as their nodata. For example, raster 1 uses -9999 as it's nodata and raster 2 uses -99999 as it's nodata. The user wants all rasters to use -9999, so all -99999 values in raster are converted to -9999 and the metadata updated
  • Overwrite nodata. Not entirely sure if this is wanted/needed, but sometimes the metadata is just set wrong (metadata says -9999 but some other value actually represents nodata). This would simply update the metadata to the number user specified.
@nmaarnio nmaarnio added the Processing algorithms Feature/issue related to QGIS processing algorithms label Mar 13, 2024
@nmaarnio
Copy link
Collaborator Author

EIS Toolkit PR GispoCoding/eis_toolkit#371 adds a few utilities that could be added as processing algorithms

@nmaarnio nmaarnio linked a pull request Apr 17, 2024 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Processing algorithms Feature/issue related to QGIS processing algorithms
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant